First drive review: 2013 Land Rover Freelander
Filed under: First Drive
Land Rover
What is it?
What's the kit like?
Any rivals?
Land Rover
Is it any good?
The AOL Cars verdict
The Knowledge
Filed under: First Drive
Land Rover
Land Rover
First drive: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee
First drive: Peugeot 2008
Ford Fiesta tops April's best-selling cars list
Land Rover celebrates turning 65
First drive: Skoda Octavia estate
First drive: BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
First drive: BMW Z4
First drive: 2013 Chevrolet Trax
First drive: Peugeot 208 GTi
First drive: Audi RS 5 Cabriolet
First drive: Jaguar F-Type
Benefit claimant who owned five 4x4 vehicles is banned...
We encourage lively discussion at AOL. Please be aware when you leave a comment your user name, screen name and photo may be displayed with your comment, visible to everyone on the Internet. If you think a comment is inappropriate, you may click to report it to our monitors for review.
Not an AOL or AIM member? Register for a free account.
It looks more like a Range Rover than a Freelander !!.... I bought a Freelander because it was a British made alternative to the Suzuki SJ. Lightweight compact and Deisel with 4 Wheel Drive. But now all that is gone !!>
December 12 2012 at 5:20 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyAnd £40K.... There must be a good supply of Crack going around the Landrover offices and im not talking about the Female kind either !!.
December 12 2012 at 5:22 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyYou get what you pay for.
If you want comfort and luxury, buy a Landrover. If you want basics buy another.
Yes you are right, it looks very much like a Range Rover.
December 12 2012 at 8:27 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI bought a secondhand one in 2009, it just loves going in the garage for repairs, I paid £2,950 it is W reg, I have now spent well over £2900 up to now , so I cant afford to part with it, but I still love it, I must be mad . lol
December 12 2012 at 4:54 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI've got a 1999 S reg, not a problem, love it.
December 12 2012 at 8:16 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI paid £15k on the road for my mk one, what thew hell have they done to ask £40k now for simaler looking car. If they have not adrest the problems I would never look at one, anything from two head gaskets, electric window problems, to water coming into the under floor boot.
December 12 2012 at 4:51 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHave driven the Freelander 2?
Completely different car. More like a Range Rover for comfort, ride and quality.
You will probably find that the electric window problem was caused through the bowden cables seizing. and the water problem is the rubber bung missing in the wheel well.
All through poor servicing.
One word description- UGLY!!!
December 12 2012 at 4:49 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFive word description.
Built for a working purpose.
£40k for some new lights that look like snowmen - you must be kidding. Also they only had it a week. After a couple of years these things fall apart. How many have had the notorioius electic window falling into the bottom of the door and getting stuck problem? everyone I know who has had one. you migt say but ah that was th eold one. Once you buy one it quickly becomes the old one. More posey junk for metrocentric country wannabes. The farmer near me uses a 2 wheel drive Citroen panel van to round his cows up for milking, it never gets stuck and is a lot less expensive than this ponsey rip off.
December 12 2012 at 4:40 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyMore AOL talent less reporting...I have had a number of Freelanders over the years and taken them where most owners would never believe of taking there's and it does the job you ask of it every time.
December 12 2012 at 4:09 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyOkay, exsup, a bit of stretching the age of it but launched in 1997 makes it 16 years old an a few weeks time and that's a long time for the same basic shape and bodyshell to be around. Fine if they asked 20-25k for it but heading towards 40k is money many people would rather spend elsewhere.
December 12 2012 at 4:18 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyHad my Freelander 10yrs and love it to bits, and yes its been in bits lots of times, lol
December 12 2012 at 4:06 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyI can't believe that this thing is still around and virtually it's unchanged to look at after nearly 20 years....the same basic body shape and LR are taking the mickey asking nearly 40k for the top of the range. Only idiots would waste this amount of money on it. There are so many better alternatives - I guess the philosophy of the buyers is 'look-at-me-I-have-a-mini-Range-Rover' when in actual fact it says 'look-at-me-I-can't-afford-a-range-rover-my-life-didn't-quite-work-out.'
December 12 2012 at 4:01 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyPetrol v's Diesel,
Despite using a very clean modern diesel engine, the diesel’s produce 24 times more NOx than the petrol versions and produce particulate matter which the petrol does not. The petrol does however produce twice the amount of carbon monoxide.
As we all know Lnd Rover ake the best four x four x far, BUT why, WHY, WHY do they show this fantastic 4x4 in a left hand drive, come on they are build in the Midlands, and we are right hand drive, a little more thought please.
December 12 2012 at 2:39 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down Reply